Please add a minimal, backward-compatible media indicator to Google Business review objects so API consumers can detect whether a review contains zero, one, or multiple photos attached directly to the review.
We do not need access to the images themselves.
{ "hasPhotos": true, "photoCount": 2 } photoCountAn integer, nullable when the exact count is unavailable.
0 = no photos attached to the review
1 = exactly one photo attached to the review
greater than 1 = multiple photos attached to the review
null = at least one photo is confirmed, but the exact count is unavailable
Please do not return an estimated or potentially incorrect count.
hasPhotosA boolean indicating whether at least one review-attached photo is confirmed.
When the exact count is known:
hasPhotos === (photoCount > 0) If the exact count cannot be exposed initially, a reliable hasPhotos boolean alone would already be very useful as a first phase.
The reviewer’s profile picture must never be counted.
This request concerns only photos attached directly to the Google review, not:
reviewer.profileImage
the business logo
business media
avatars
unrelated media
Please expose the fields on Google Business review objects returned by:
GET /v1/inbox/reviews?platform=googlebusiness&accountId=... Ideally, include the same fields in:
review.new webhook payloads
review.updated webhook payloads
This would allow automations to react immediately without additional polling.
We are not requesting:
image URLs
thumbnails
image binaries
image content
OCR
image labels or descriptions
EXIF metadata
visual analysis
Only the confirmed presence and, when available, the number of review-attached photos are needed.
Our application generates personalized replies to Google reviews.
For positive reviews, this metadata would allow safe wording such as:
photoCount = 0 → do not mention photos photoCount = 1 → thank the customer for “this lovely photo” photoCount > 1 → thank the customer for “these lovely photos” hasPhotos = true and photoCount = null → use neutral wording that does not assume singular or plural The automation would never describe the photo content.
It would only mention photos for positive reviews, typically 4 or 5 stars.
Expose:
{ "hasPhotos": true } A reliable boolean alone already unlocks the main use case.
Add:
{ "photoCount": 2 } This allows correct singular/plural wording.
This would be a non-breaking addition for existing consumers.
For platforms other than Google Business, the fields could be:
omitted;
returned as null;
or consistently returned as hasPhotos: false and photoCount: 0.
Any approach is acceptable as long as it is documented consistently.
This small metadata addition would significantly improve the personalization and natural quality of automated Google review replies without exposing any image data or increasing privacy risk.
We would also be happy to beta test the feature as soon as an early version is available.
Please authenticate to join the conversation.
In Review
Feature Request
1 day ago

AKA PREEM
Get notified by email when there are changes.
In Review
Feature Request
1 day ago

AKA PREEM
Get notified by email when there are changes.